YASHIL IQTISODIYOTGA O‘TISH JARAYONIDA KORPORATIV BOSHQARUVNING EKOLOGIK SAMARADORLIKNI SHAKLLANTIRUVCHI INSTITUTSIONAL MEXANIZMLARI
Keywords:
yashil iqtisodiyot, korporativ boshqaruv, ekologik samaradorlik, barqaror rivojlanish, ekologik innovatsiyalar, resurslardan foydalanish, chiqindilarni kamaytirish, energiya tejamkorlik, ekologik menejment, javobgarlik, shaffoflik, ekologik barqarorlik, institutsional mexanizmlar.Abstract
Ushbu maqolada yashil iqtisodiyot sharoitida korporativ boshqaruv tizimining ekologik samaradorlikka ko‘rsatadigan ta’siri tahlil qilinadi. Tadqiqotda korporativ boshqaruvning shaffoflik, javobgarlik va manfaatdor tomonlar bilan hamkorlik tamoyillari ekologik natijalarga qanday ta’sir qilishi o‘rganiladi. Ekologik samaradorlik mezonlari sifatida resurslardan oqilona foydalanish, chiqindilarni kamaytirish, energiya tejamkor texnologiyalarni joriy etish va ekologik innovatsiyalarni rivojlantirish ko‘rsatkichlari asos sifatida tanlangan. Metodologik yondashuv sifatida tizimli tahlil, korrelyatsion bog‘liqlikni baholash hamda korxona darajasida ekologik boshqaruv amaliyotlari monitoringi qo‘llanilgan. Olingan natijalar korporativ boshqaruv sifati oshgan sari korxonalarning ekologik samaradorligi sezilarli ravishda yaxshilanayotganini ko‘rsatadi. Tadqiqot yakunida korporativ boshqaruvni ekologik barqarorlik bilan uyg‘unlashtirish mexanizmlarini takomillashtirish bo‘yicha amaliy takliflar ishlab chiqilgan.
Downloads
References
1. United Nations. Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.
2. World Bank. (2023). Green Growth Opportunities for Sustainable Development. Washington, DC: World Bank Publications.
3. OECD. (2023). Regions and Innovation: Collaborating Across Borders. Paris: OECD Publishing.
4. World Economic Forum. (2020). Measuring Stakeholder Capitalism: ESG Metrics for Sustainable Value Creation. Geneva: World Economic Forum.
5. Barbier, E. B. (2012). The Concept of Green Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6. Porter, M. E., & Van der Linde, C. (1995). Toward a New Conception of the Environment–Competitiveness Relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 97–118.
7. Hart, S. L., & Milstein, M. B. (1999). Global Sustainability and the Creative Destruction of Industries. Sloan Management Review, 41(1), 23–33.
8. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston, MA: Pitman Publishing.
9. Clarkson, P. M., Li, Y., Richardson, G. D., & Vasvari, F. P. (2011). Does It Really Pay to Be Green? Determinants and Consequences of Proactive Environmental Strategy. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 30(2), 122–144.
10. UNDP. Human Development Report 2022: Uncertain Times, Unsettled Lives. New York: United Nations Development Programme.
11. Murova, O., & Stead, J. G. (2020). Corporate Environmental Responsibility and Sustainable Innovation. London: Routledge Publishing.
12. European Commission. (2023). Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive Implementation Guide. Brussels: EU Publications.
13. Lee, K. H., & Min, B. (2015). Green R&D for Sustainable Business: Evidence from Korea. Journal of Business Ethics, 128(3), 1–15.
14. UN Environment Programme (UNEP). (2018). Green Fiscal Policy and Corporate Sustainability. Nairobi: United Nations Environment Programme.
15. O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Prezidentining 2022-yil 2-dekabrdagi “2030-yilgacha Oʻzbekiston Respublikasining “yashil” iqtisodiyotga oʻtishiga
qaratilgan islohotlar samaradorligini oshirish boʻyicha chora-tadbirlar toʻgʻrisida”gi PQ-436-son Qarori.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
License Terms of our Journal
