MOLIYAVIY AUTSORSING NAZARIYALARI VA ULARNING BOZOR SAMARADORLIGINI BAHOLASH MEXANIZMLARI

Authors

  • Babadjanov Umidbek Kamildjanovich Author

Keywords:

autsorsing, moliyaviy autsorsing, autsorsing nazariyalari, iqtisodiy samaradorlik ko’rsatkich, moliyaniy xizmatlar, boholash mexanizmi.

Abstract

Mazkur maqolada moliyaviy autsorsing nazariyalari va ularning bozor samaradorligini baholash mexanizmlari ilmiy-nazariy hamda amaliy jihatdan tahlil qilinadi. Tadqiqotda tranzaksiya xarajatlari, agentlik, resurslarga asoslangan va strategik boshqaruv nazariyalari asosida moliyaviy autsorsingning iqtisodiy samaradorligini o‘lchash tamoyillari ishlab chiqilgan. Maqolada autsorsing xizmatlarining samaradorlik ko‘rsatkichlari — xarajatlarni tejash, vaqtni optimallashtirish, sifat va shaffoflikni oshirish darajalari — jadval asosida tahlil qilinib, raqamli va innovatsion yondashuvlar eng yuqori natijalarni berishi aniqlangan. Tadqiqot metodologiyasi tizimli, komparativ va indeksli tahlil usullariga tayangan holda ishlab chiqilgan bo‘lib, moliyaviy autsorsing samaradorligi kompozit indeks modeli orqali baholangan. Natijalar shuni ko‘rsatadiki, moliyaviy autsorsing nazariyalarining uyg‘unlashuvi iqtisodiy, tashkiliy va texnologik jihatdan optimal boshqaruv mexanizmlarini shakllantiradi. Xulosa sifatida, ishlab chiqilgan model O‘zbekiston Respublikasi moliyaviy xizmatlar bozorining raqobatbardoshligini, shaffofligini va barqaror rivojlanishini ta’minlashda ilmiy-amaliy asos bo‘lib xizmat qiladi.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Coase, R. H. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica, 4(16), 386–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0335.1937.tb00002.x

2. Williamson, O. E. (1975). Markets and hierarchies: Analysis and antitrust implications. New York, NY: Free Press.

3. Corbett, M. F. (1989). The outsourcing revolution: Why it makes sense and how to do it right. New York, NY: Dearborn Trade Publishing.

4. Drucker, P. F. (1990). Managing the Non-Profit Organization: Practices and Principles. New York, NY: HarperCollins.

5. Deloitte (2022). Global Outsourcing Survey.

6. KPMG (2022). Finance Function Benchmarking Report. McKinsey (2023). Strategic Finance Outsourcing Models

7. Ernst & Young (2020). Why ESG Matters in Outsourcing.

8. Williamson, O. E. (1985). The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. Accenture (2023). Finance Transformation Through Digital Outsourcing. Gartner Reports (2022–2024).

Downloads

Published

2025-10-22

Issue

Section

Economics

How to Cite

MOLIYAVIY AUTSORSING NAZARIYALARI VA ULARNING BOZOR SAMARADORLIGINI BAHOLASH MEXANIZMLARI. (2025). Innovations in Science and Technologies, 2(9), 181-186. https://innoist.uz/index.php/ist/article/view/1282

Similar Articles

1-10 of 381

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.